Sub­sti­tu­tion always works, but rear­rang­ing an equa­tion to iso­late one vari­able can cre­ate frac­tions before the real work begins. The elim­i­na­tion method, the sec­ond alge­braic method in Chap­ter 3 of the NCERT Class 10 text­book, often avoids this. Instead of rewrit­ing one equa­tion and feed­ing it into the other, you work with both whole equa­tions at once and com­bine them so that one vari­able can­cels out, or is elim­i­nated. What remains is a sim­ple equa­tion in a sin­gle vari­able. Elim­i­na­tion is the quick­est route in many word prob­lems on incomes, prices, dig­its and ages, and the same idea of com­bin­ing equa­tions is used later for larger sys­tems of equa­tions.

What the elim­i­na­tion method is

The idea in plain words

If a vari­able, say yy, has the same coef­fi­cient in both equa­tions, sub­tract­ing one whole equa­tion from the other makes the yy-terms can­cel exactly. If the coef­fi­cients are equal in size but oppo­site in sign, such as +3y+3y and −3y-3y, adding the equa­tions does the same job. Equa­tions rarely come with match­ing coef­fi­cients, so the first move is usu­ally to mul­ti­ply each equa­tion by a suit­able non-zero num­ber to make them match.

Why it works

Two facts jus­tify every step:

  • Mul­ti­ply­ing both sides of an equa­tion by a non-zero num­ber gives an equa­tion with exactly the same solu­tions. For exam­ple, 2x+3y=82x + 3y = 8 and 4x+6y=164x + 6y = 16 are sat­is­fied by the same pairs.
  • If (x,y)(x, y) sat­is­fies two equa­tions, it also sat­is­fies their sum and their dif­fer­ence, because equal quan­ti­ties added to (or sub­tracted from) equal quan­ti­ties give equal results.

So any solu­tion of the orig­i­nal pair must sat­isfy the one-vari­able equa­tion obtained after elim­i­na­tion. Sub­sti­tut­ing the value back into an orig­i­nal equa­tion then recov­ers the full solu­tion, and check­ing in both equa­tions con­firms it.

The method in steps

  1. Mul­ti­ply one or both equa­tions by suit­able non-zero num­bers so that one vari­able has numer­i­cally equal coef­fi­cients in the two equa­tions. The low­est com­mon mul­ti­ple of the two coef­fi­cients is usu­ally the best tar­get.
  2. Sub­tract the equa­tions if those coef­fi­cients have the same sign; add them if the signs are oppo­site. One vari­able dis­ap­pears.
  3. Solve the result­ing equa­tion in one vari­able.
  4. Sub­sti­tute this value into either of the orig­i­nal equa­tions to find the other vari­able, and check the pair in both equa­tions.

If in Step 2 both vari­ables dis­ap­pear, the left­over state­ment tells you the type of pair: a true state­ment such as 0=00 = 0 means infi­nitely many solu­tions; a false state­ment such as 0=90 = 9 means no solu­tion.

Worked exam­ples

Exam­ple 1: coef­fi­cients already oppo­site

Solve x+2y=8x + 2y = 8 and 3x−2y=83x - 2y = 8.

The yy-coef­fi­cients are +2+2 and −2-2, so add the equa­tions:

(x+2y)+(3x−2y)=8+8  ⇒  4x=16  ⇒  x=4(x + 2y) + (3x - 2y) = 8 + 8 \;\Rightarrow\; 4x = 16 \;\Rightarrow\; x = 4

Then from x+2y=8x + 2y = 8: 4+2y=84 + 2y = 8, so y=2y = 2.

Check. 4+2(2)=84 + 2(2) = 8 and 3(4)−2(2)=83(4) - 2(2) = 8. So x=4x = 4, y=2y = 2.

Exam­ple 2: mul­ti­ply­ing both equa­tions

Solve 5x+3y=21(1)5x + 3y = 21 \quad (1) and 2x−5y=−4(2)2x - 5y = -4 \quad (2).

The yy-coef­fi­cients are 33 and −5-5; their LCM is 1515. Mul­ti­ply (1) by 5 and (2) by 3:

25x+15y=105(3)6x−15y=−12(4)25x + 15y = 105 \quad (3) \qquad 6x - 15y = -12 \quad (4)

The signs of the yy-terms are oppo­site, so add (3) and (4):

31x=93  ⇒  x=331x = 93 \;\Rightarrow\; x = 3

From (1): 15+3y=2115 + 3y = 21, so 3y=63y = 6 and y=2y = 2.

Check. 5(3)+3(2)=215(3) + 3(2) = 21 and 2(3)−5(2)=−42(3) - 5(2) = -4. So x=3x = 3, y=2y = 2.

Exam­ple 3: incomes and sav­ings

The ratio of the incomes of two per­sons is 9:79 : 7 and the ratio of their expen­di­tures is 4:34 : 3. If each of them saves ₹2000 per month, find their monthly incomes.

Because the incomes are in the ratio 9:79 : 7, call them ₹9x9x and ₹7x7x. Sim­i­larly, call the expen­di­tures ₹4y4y and ₹3y3y. Since income minus expen­di­ture equals sav­ings,

9x−4y=2000(1)7x−3y=2000(2)9x - 4y = 2000 \quad (1) \qquad 7x - 3y = 2000 \quad (2)

Step 1: match a coef­fi­cient. Mul­ti­ply (1) by 3 and (2) by 4, so that yy has coef­fi­cient −12-12 in both:

27x−12y=6000(3)28x−12y=8000(4)27x - 12y = 6000 \quad (3) \qquad 28x - 12y = 8000 \quad (4)

Step 2: sub­tract. The yy-terms have the same sign, so sub­tract (3) from (4):

(28x−27x)−(12y−12y)=8000−6000  ⇒  x=2000(28x - 27x) - (12y - 12y) = 8000 - 6000 \;\Rightarrow\; x = 2000

Step 3: sub­sti­tute back. Put x=2000x = 2000 in (1):

18000−4y=2000  ⇒  4y=16000  ⇒  y=400018000 - 4y = 2000 \;\Rightarrow\; 4y = 16000 \;\Rightarrow\; y = 4000

So the incomes are 9x=180009x = 18000 and 7x=140007x = 14000, that is, ₹18,000 and ₹14,000 per month.

Check. 18000:14000=9:718000 : 14000 = 9 : 7. The expen­di­tures are 18000−2000=1600018000 - 2000 = 16000 and 14000−2000=1200014000 - 2000 = 12000, and 16000:12000=4:316000 : 12000 = 4 : 3, which also equals 4y:3y4y : 3y with y=4000y = 4000.

Graph of the lines 9x minus 4y equals 2000 and 7x minus 3y equals 2000, two steep lines that cross at the orange point (2000, 4000), labelled incomes 18,000 and 14,000 rupees
The income equa­tions meet at x=2000x = 2000, y=4000y = 4000. The lines are nearly par­al­lel, so read­ing the point from a graph would be unre­li­able.

Exam­ple 4: when elim­i­na­tion shows there is no solu­tion

Solve 2x+3y=8(1)2x + 3y = 8 \quad (1) and 4x+6y=7(2)4x + 6y = 7 \quad (2).

Mul­ti­ply (1) by 2 so that both equa­tions con­tain 4x4x:

4x+6y=16(3)4x + 6y = 16 \quad (3)

Sub­tract (2) from (3):

(4x−4x)+(6y−6y)=16−7  ⇒  0=9(4x - 4x) + (6y - 6y) = 16 - 7 \;\Rightarrow\; 0 = 9

Both vari­ables have van­ished and the state­ment is false, so the pair has no solu­tion. The ratio test agrees: a1a2=24\displaystyle \frac{a_1}{a_2} = \frac{2}{4} and b1b2=36\displaystyle \frac{b_1}{b_2} = \frac{3}{6} are equal, but c1c2=87\displaystyle \frac{c_1}{c_2} = \frac{8}{7} is dif­fer­ent, which is the pat­tern for par­al­lel lines.

Com­pare this with 3x−y=23x - y = 2 and 6x−2y=46x - 2y = 4. Dou­bling the first and sub­tract­ing gives 0=00 = 0, which is always true, so that pair has infi­nitely many solu­tions: the two equa­tions describe the same line.

Graph of the parallel lines 2x+3y=8 and 4x+6y=7, both with slope minus 2/3, cutting the y-axis at (0, 8/3) and (0, 7/6) and never meeting
Elim­i­na­tion gave 0=90 = 9: the lines have the same slope and dif­fer­ent inter­cepts, so they never meet.

Exam­ple 5: a puz­zle about dig­its

The sum of a two-digit num­ber and the num­ber obtained by revers­ing its dig­its is 66. If the dig­its of the num­ber dif­fer by 2, find the num­ber. How many such num­bers are there?

Let the tens digit be xx and the units digit be yy. The num­ber is 10x+y10x + y (for exam­ple, 56=10×5+656 = 10 \times 5 + 6), and the reversed num­ber is 10y+x10y + x.

The sum con­di­tion gives

(10x+y)+(10y+x)=66  ⇒  11(x+y)=66  ⇒  x+y=6(1)(10x + y) + (10y + x) = 66 \;\Rightarrow\; 11(x + y) = 66 \;\Rightarrow\; x + y = 6 \quad (1)

"The dig­its dif­fer by 2" can mean x−y=2(2)x - y = 2 \quad (2) or y−x=2(3)y - x = 2 \quad (3), since we do not know which digit is larger. Solve both cases.

Case 1: (1) and (2). Adding them elim­i­nates yy: 2x=82x = 8, so x=4x = 4 and y=2y = 2. The num­ber is 42.

Case 2: (1) and (3). Adding them elim­i­nates xx: 2y=82y = 8, so y=4y = 4 and x=2x = 2. The num­ber is 24.

Check. 42+24=6642 + 24 = 66, and in each num­ber the dig­its 4 and 2 dif­fer by 2. So there are two such num­bers, 42 and 24.

Choos­ing among the three meth­ods

You now have three ways to solve a pair of lin­ear equa­tions in two vari­ables:

  • Graph­i­cal method: draw both lines and see where they meet. It shows most clearly why a pair can have one solu­tion, no solu­tion or infi­nitely many (inter­sect­ing, par­al­lel or coin­ci­dent lines), but exact val­ues are hard to read unless they are inte­gers.
  • Sub­sti­tu­tion method: express one vari­able in terms of the other and sub­sti­tute. It is usu­ally quick­est when some vari­able has coef­fi­cient 11 or −1-1.
  • Elim­i­na­tion method: scale the equa­tions so one vari­able has match­ing coef­fi­cients, then add or sub­tract. It is usu­ally quick­est when the coef­fi­cients are larger num­bers or already line up.

All three meth­ods always give the same answer for the same pair; they are dif­fer­ent routes to one des­ti­na­tion. With prac­tice you will choose the short­est route by look­ing at the coef­fi­cients.

Com­mon mis­takes

  • Mul­ti­ply­ing only one side of an equa­tion. Every term on both sides must be mul­ti­plied, includ­ing the con­stant.
  • Adding when you should sub­tract, or the reverse. Same signs: sub­tract. Oppo­site signs: add.
  • Sign errors while sub­tract­ing a whole equa­tion. Write it with brack­ets, such as (28x−12y)−(27x−12y)(28x - 12y) - (27x - 12y), before sim­pli­fy­ing.
  • Sub­sti­tut­ing back into a scaled equa­tion that was copied wrongly. It is safer to use one of the orig­i­nal equa­tions.
  • In digit prob­lems, writ­ing the num­ber as x+yx + y instead of 10x+y10x + y, or for­get­ting that "dif­fer by 2" allows two cases.
  • Treat­ing 0=00 = 0 as "no solu­tion". A true state­ment means infi­nitely many solu­tions; only a false one, such as 0=90 = 9, means none.

Try these

  1. Solve x+y=10x + y = 10 and x−y=4x - y = 4. Answer: x=7x = 7, y=3y = 3.
  2. Solve 3x+2y=113x + 2y = 11 and 2x+3y=42x + 3y = 4. Answer: x=5x = 5, y=−2y = -2.
  3. Solve 4x−3y=14x - 3y = 1 and 12x−9y=312x - 9y = 3. Answer: infi­nitely many solu­tions.
  4. Solve 2x−5y=32x - 5y = 3 and 4x−10y=54x - 10y = 5. Answer: no solu­tion.
  5. The dig­its of a two-digit num­ber add up to 12. Revers­ing the dig­its increases the num­ber by 18. Find the num­ber. Answer: 57.
  6. 3 chairs and 2 tables cost ₹4,700, while 5 chairs and 3 tables cost ₹7,400. Find the cost of a chair and of a table. Answer: a chair costs ₹700 and a table ₹1,300.

Key terms

Elim­i­na­tion method
An alge­braic method that adds or sub­tracts suit­able mul­ti­ples of two equa­tions so that one vari­able can­cels.
Coef­fi­cient
The num­ber mul­ti­ply­ing a vari­able, such as −4-4 in −4y-4y.
Equiv­a­lent equa­tions
Equa­tions with exactly the same solu­tions, for exam­ple an equa­tion and a non-zero mul­ti­ple of it.
Con­sis­tent pair
A pair of equa­tions with at least one solu­tion.
Incon­sis­tent pair
A pair with no solu­tion; elim­i­na­tion leaves a false state­ment such as 0=90 = 9.
Depen­dent pair
A pair with infi­nitely many solu­tions; elim­i­na­tion leaves a true state­ment such as 0=00 = 0.
Place value form
Writ­ing a two-digit num­ber with tens digit xx and units digit yy as 10x+y10x + y.

Com­mon ques­tions

How do I decide which vari­able to elim­i­nate?

Choose the vari­able whose coef­fi­cients need the small­est mul­ti­pli­ers to match, or whose coef­fi­cients already match or are oppo­site. Either choice leads to the same answer.

Can I divide an equa­tion instead of mul­ti­ply­ing?

Yes. Divid­ing by a non-zero num­ber also gives an equiv­a­lent equa­tion. For exam­ple, 50x+100y=200050x + 100y = 2000 can be divided by 50 to give x+2y=40x + 2y = 40.

Why sub­sti­tute into an orig­i­nal equa­tion at the end?

The orig­i­nal equa­tions are the ones you copied from the ques­tion, so using them avoids car­ry­ing for­ward any slip made while scal­ing.

Is elim­i­na­tion bet­ter than sub­sti­tu­tion?

Nei­ther is always bet­ter. Elim­i­na­tion is often faster when coef­fi­cients are larger or already match; sub­sti­tu­tion is often faster when a vari­able has coef­fi­cient 1.

How does elim­i­na­tion show the type of pair?

If one vari­able remains, there is exactly one solu­tion. If both van­ish, a true state­ment means infi­nitely many solu­tions and a false state­ment means no solu­tion.

Ref­er­ences

  1. National Coun­cil of Edu­ca­tional Research and Train­ing. Math­e­mat­ics: Text­book for Class X. NCERT, New Delhi.
  2. Aggar­wal, R. S. Sec­ondary School Math­e­mat­ics for Class 10. Bharati Bhawan.
  3. Hall, H. S. and Knight, S. R. Higher Alge­bra. Macmil­lan.