The long-run total cost curve looks sim­i­lar to the short-run total cost curve, just at a larger scale. Every deci­sion is made in the short run, with an exist­ing short-run cost curve, but a deci­sion to invest in greater capac­ity, such as a larger man­u­fac­tur­ing plant, is a long-run deci­sion. It is a deci­sion that allows the firm to be on a lower short-run aver­age total cost curve (includ­ing both fixed and vari­able costs) in the future.

The scale of pro­duc­tion is the long-run effi­ciency of pro­duc­ing out­puts from the inputs, char­ac­ter­ized by choos­ing between the pos­si­ble short-run aver­age total cost curves. The process of expand­ing a busi­ness is called scal­ing up.

Scal­ing up may or may not be ben­e­fi­cial for a given com­pany. The long-run pro­duc­tion process could have increas­ing, decreas­ing, or con­stant returns to scale. Like the short-run aver­age cost curve, the long-run aver­age cost curve is U-shaped, with a min­i­mum point. The out­put at which long-run aver­age cost first reaches this min­i­mum is called the min­i­mum effi­cient scale (MES).

Increas­ing returns to scale means that when the busi­ness scales up, the pro­duc­tion becomes more effi­cient. That means the long-run aver­age total costs are decreas­ing. Econ­o­mists call this economies of scale. On the U-shaped long-run aver­age cost curve, the down­ward-slop­ing part shows economies of scale.

On the other hand, decreas­ing returns to scale means that when the busi­ness scales up, the pro­duc­tion becomes less effi­cient. That means the long-run aver­age total costs are increas­ing. Econ­o­mists call this dis­ec­onomies of scale. On the U-shaped long-run aver­age cost curve, the upward-slop­ing part shows dis­ec­onomies of scale.

Being able to oper­ate at min­i­mum effi­cient scale can allow a firm to stay in busi­ness even if demand falls and the price is lower than expected. It means being the low­est-cost pro­ducer in the mar­ket. A mar­ket is pro­duc­tively effi­cient when the most effi­cient pro­duc­ers are the ones pro­duc­ing the good. In other words, oper­at­ing at a min­i­mum effi­cient scale helps improve mar­ket effi­ciency.

Min­i­mum effi­cient scale also helps keep the mar­ket com­pet­i­tive. In the long run, if there are suf­fi­ciently low bar­ri­ers to entry, then only the firms that are able to oper­ate at the most effi­cient scale will be able to sur­vive. In that way, firms' deci­sions regard­ing long-term pro­duc­tion costs help deter­mine the mar­ket struc­ture and the num­ber of firms.

Key terms

Economies of scale
The cost advan­tages a firm gains as its scale of out­put grows, shown by falling long-run aver­age cost.
Dis­ec­onomies of scale
The rise in long-run aver­age cost when a firm grows beyond its most effi­cient size.
Min­i­mum effi­cient scale
The low­est out­put at which long-run aver­age cost reaches its min­i­mum.